Here’s Exactly How the Jury Awarded Apple $119 Million in Latest Samsung Patent Case
Apple v Samsung $119 million
In deciding to award Apple $119 million in the latest Apple-Samsung patent case, the jury had to make their way through a 12-page matrix of products, patents and dates.
So, it’s not surprising that attorneys found one minor inconsistency–the one that will force the jury back to work on Monday. For a single product–The Galaxy SII–the jury awarded no damages even though it found infringement. While possible under certain circumstances, Judge Lucy Koh ruled that the jury should be reminded that Apple is entitled to a reasonable royalty for any products found to infringe.
The ruling means that the final amount due Apple is likely to be slightly higher than the initial verdict.
Meanwhile, the jury also found Apple infringed on one Samsung patent, and awarded the Korean electronic giant about $158,000 in damages.
Here’s the full jury form:
More Posts About the Apple-Samsung Trial
- Appeals Court Due to Take Up Apple-Samsung Case on Thursday
- Apple, Samsung Agree to Drop Non-U.S. Litigation, but Still No Settlement
- In Modest Victory for Apple, Dutch Appeals Court Upholds Sales Ban on Older Samsung Galaxy Phones
- Apple, Google Settle Motorola Patent Dispute But Broader Issues Remain
- Apple-Samsung Jurors Say Google’s Role Intriguing, but Didn’t Determine Outcome
- Apple-Samsung Jury Recalculates Verdict, but Leaves Intact Original $119 Million Award
- What the Apple-Samsung Jury Will Have to Clarify on Monday
- A Look at Google’s Not-Always-Secret Contracts With Android Phone Makers
- There’s No Dancing in Streets of Cupertino After Latest Apple-Samsung Verdict
- Here’s Exactly How the Jury Awarded Apple $119 Million in Latest Samsung Patent Case