Jeff Bezos during the D6 Conference

Asa Mathat

Jeff Bezos during the D6 Conference

Media


We know some important things about the streaming video gadget Amazon is introducing today:

  • Like Amazon’s Kindle Fire tablets, it will give users access to Amazon’s own video service, as well as third-party app/services like Netflix.
  • Like the Fire machines, it will run on a “forked” version of Android.
  • It’s going to compete with a bunch of devices that also make it easier to move streaming video to your TV, like the Apple TV, Roku’s gadgets and Google’s Chromecast.
  • Amazon has been working on a device like this for a while. Last year, it had planned on rolling one out before Christmas, but it shelved those plans.

I don’t know if the Amazon video doohickey is going to be a stick or a box, though my educated guess is that it will be a box. But I don’t really care what it looks like, and my hunch is that most potential buyers/users won’t either, as long as it works.

Which leaves one thing that I’m really interested in learning about today: How much is this going to cost?

Unless Amazon adds a lot of bells and whistles to its mystery box — like a full-fledged game controller — it’s reasonable to assume it won’t sell for more than $99, which is what Apple TV and the top of the line Roku box go for. But when Google introduced Chromecast at $35 a pop last summer, that price seemed to interest a lot of people.

So why not go the next step, and simply make the thing free for anyone with a $99 Amazon Prime subscription?

That’s what Amazon is already doing with its Prime Instant video service, of course. And Jeff Bezos is spending more than a billion dollars a year on that giveaway, just so he can convince more people to sign up for his real subscription service, which gives them other goodies like free two-day shipping and encourages them to buy more stuff from Amazon.

So throwing in a relatively low-cost box — so it can make Prime Instant video more appealing, so it can make the main Prime service more appealing — seems like a no-brainer to Internet geniuses like me. Especially since many people don’t know that Prime Instant video exists, even if they have access to it.

The best argument against this theory is that we’ve heard it before — every time Bezos rolls out a new Kindle line. Surely, the Internet geniuses predict, this time Bezos is going to give his tablets away. After all — he doesn’t care about profits, right? 

But it’s 2014, and if you want to buy a new Kindle from Amazon, it’s going to cost you a minimum of $69. And that’s if you’re willing to see ads from Amazon on the thing. Just because Bezos could give his hardware away doesn’t mean he’s going to.

Still. Wouldn’t it be cool if he did?  We’ll find out in a few hours.




4 comments
KeKyKo
KeKyKo

 Had a Vizio when it first came out (stopped working exactly one year, 3 days after the warranty ended), I now have the Sony NSZ-GS8 which I love but what these both have that the Amazon box does not is HDMI pass through, meaning I dont have to switch inputs, such a simple idea that I simply cannot do without.  Just not having this is a deal breaker for me, keeping my Sony GTV.  BUT for $99 if this came free with an Amazon Prime membership I would get a membership.

KGM
KGM

I have an Apple TV and it works just fine.  I am thinking about spending $99 for Amazon Prime, but am still trying to figure out how many purchases I would have to make to equal the shipping cost of $99.  However, if Amazon combines Prime and Fire TV for $99, count me in.

Marc (DarcFlii LLC)
Marc (DarcFlii LLC)

It's odd that all these devices virtually do the same thing by way of accessing the same content. I'm sorry -- we don't need thirty-five million netflix devices.

Cwong5
Cwong5

$99 is way too expensive. Same price as AppleTV and almost double Chromcast. blah ;(

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 279,750 other followers